Ranga Ranga Vaibhavanga Review

Vaishnav Tej is still recognized as the hero of "Uppena" despite already appearing in a flop with "Kondapolam". Ketika Sharma, who appeared as the heroine in "Romantic", has quite a following among the young audience. Both of them appeared on the screen with this movie.

The thing is...two families are living together in houses next to each other. There is a fight between them due to a reason. Dramatically meet at the end. That's all there is to tell as a story.

No mistake. There are no rules that the story of a movie should be like this or that. Everything is in the treatment, in the styling of the story and in conceiving the scene. Trivikram, who rebooted the 1970s movie "Meena" as it was and made it a hit with the name "Aa Aa", is among us. Also, it was Trivikram who took the 1960's "Intiguttu" and changed it a bit to make "Ala Vaikunthapuramlo" a blockbuster hit. Taking an old story and making it new is an art.
Such a thing..this director has made a movie of 1990s in 2022. If the story starts with the "Ninne Pelladata" poster that came out in 1996, we would think something. But if you look for a while, you will understand that the director's brain stopped at that time. Audience has certain expectations on every hero. It can be said that the director has taken advantage of the opportunity if he can run the story to meet those expectations and if possible be at that level.
Making a movie with the sensibilities of years ago with a mega family hero is a proof of the director's imagination and the producer's lack of understanding. A plot without any twists, strong characters, laugh-out-loud comedy, two-and-a-half-decade-old story, and poor scene-conceiving lead the audience in the desert. The oases in the middle are songs. Musically and lyrically they are soothing to the ears.
As for the background music again, the original Devisree Prasad Panena is bland. If the scene is dull then the background music should lift it up. That work did not happen at all. Maybe the music got boring after seeing that scene. Ketikasharma, on the other hand, has a romantic touch in a song. While she looked beautiful on screen, she also performed well.
But if Vaishnav Tej continues to make films like this saying "Uppena" forever, then his career is sure to go on a side track and go in a loop line. There is not a single scene in this movie where his talent is shown. Hero characters in low budget movies with new actors are better. It's not so bad without a single memorable scene
Prabhu and Naresh are more for padding artists and less for character artists. Except for a moment in the climax, Prabhuke did the entire movie without speaking. Sreelakshmi, who was a great actress of those days, was like a junior artiste, but no real character was needed. Naveen Chandraki has been given a somewhat noteworthy role. But overall, it is still the old way but nothing new. Srihari used to play such roles at that time.
Tulsi and Pragathi seemed to be good in one or two scenes but overall they gave a poor performance. Satya's comedy is like a bad imitation of Sunil's comedy of two decades ago. "Mom, you have to see..." The song is like a peak of frustration.
Subbaraju's character was played as a banana. Ali is a cameo character. It was also partially written. Rajaravindra's character is cheap. One of the dialogues he utters while sounding stupid is disgusting. Pawan Kalyan wants to impress by making a movie, the hero sings old Chiranjeevi songs and reminds him that he is a mega hero is in poor taste.
Putting smoking and drinking scenes on Medicos in the name of mass comedy is irresponsible. After seeing the climax of the story in the background of "Karthik Deepam" serial, one feels "sad" after seeing the IQ of the makers of this film.
It can be asked whether family stories should not be shown on the screen and if they are, will they be criticized like this? As mentioned above, all kinds of stories can come on the screen. But these kinds of stories are already coming in the form of serials on TV. Reducing the length of such a serial and making it into a movie is like underestimating the audience. That's why if you watch it on TV, you will be disappointed if you watch it in the theater.